Skip to Content
True Catholic Faith
Home
Start Here!
Welcome
Vatican II Created a New, False Religion
The Novus Ordo “Mass” Is Not Catholic
The Smoking Gun
Quo Primum - Why Popes cannot abolish the TLM
Guide to True Catholicism (If...then...)
You Can Still Be Catholic Today—Without Compromise
Navigate where to attend a valid mass
FAQ
The Forgotten Revolution
Table of Contents
What happened to the Catholic Church? - 1
The Church Before & After Vatican II - 2
The Validity of the Novus Ordo Mass - 3
The Problem of Invalid Ordinations - 4
The Validity in the Post-Vatican II Sacraments - 5
Vatican II vs. Traditional Catholic Doctrine - 6
The Vatican II "Popes" - 7
Expedited "Canonizations" - 8
A Call to Action - 9
The Vatican II Crisis - Bonus 1
Embracing the True Catholic Faith - Bonus 2
Quotes from Catholic Sources - Bonus 3
Videos
Articles
Latin
Books
Links
Contact
Login Account
0
0
True Catholic Faith
Home
Start Here!
Welcome
Vatican II Created a New, False Religion
The Novus Ordo “Mass” Is Not Catholic
The Smoking Gun
Quo Primum - Why Popes cannot abolish the TLM
Guide to True Catholicism (If...then...)
You Can Still Be Catholic Today—Without Compromise
Navigate where to attend a valid mass
FAQ
The Forgotten Revolution
Table of Contents
What happened to the Catholic Church? - 1
The Church Before & After Vatican II - 2
The Validity of the Novus Ordo Mass - 3
The Problem of Invalid Ordinations - 4
The Validity in the Post-Vatican II Sacraments - 5
Vatican II vs. Traditional Catholic Doctrine - 6
The Vatican II "Popes" - 7
Expedited "Canonizations" - 8
A Call to Action - 9
The Vatican II Crisis - Bonus 1
Embracing the True Catholic Faith - Bonus 2
Quotes from Catholic Sources - Bonus 3
Videos
Articles
Latin
Books
Links
Contact
Login Account
0
0
Home
Folder: Start Here!
Back
Welcome
Vatican II Created a New, False Religion
The Novus Ordo “Mass” Is Not Catholic
The Smoking Gun
Quo Primum - Why Popes cannot abolish the TLM
Guide to True Catholicism (If...then...)
You Can Still Be Catholic Today—Without Compromise
Navigate where to attend a valid mass
FAQ
Folder: The Forgotten Revolution
Back
Table of Contents
What happened to the Catholic Church? - 1
The Church Before & After Vatican II - 2
The Validity of the Novus Ordo Mass - 3
The Problem of Invalid Ordinations - 4
The Validity in the Post-Vatican II Sacraments - 5
Vatican II vs. Traditional Catholic Doctrine - 6
The Vatican II "Popes" - 7
Expedited "Canonizations" - 8
A Call to Action - 9
The Vatican II Crisis - Bonus 1
Embracing the True Catholic Faith - Bonus 2
Quotes from Catholic Sources - Bonus 3
Videos
Articles
Latin
Books
Links
Contact
Login Account
Articles The Open Letter accusing Francis of Heresy
Novus Ordo Watch.png Image 1 of 2
Novus Ordo Watch.png
Screenshot from 2024-12-06 07-01-10.png Image 2 of 2
Screenshot from 2024-12-06 07-01-10.png
Novus Ordo Watch.png
Screenshot from 2024-12-06 07-01-10.png

The Open Letter accusing Francis of Heresy

$0.00

More than a week has now passed since the publication of the “Open Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church” released on Apr. 30 by nineteen Novus Ordo clergymen and academics accusing “Pope” Francis of being a pertinacious heretic and asking the addressees to declare him such and thereby remove him from office. Since then, many more academics and clerics have added their names to the Open Letter, and at the time of this writing, the total is up to 81 (see updates here).

While countless Novus Ordo web sites have covered the fallout from this so far and will continue to do so in the days to come, it is time for some sedevacantist analysis and commentary — the kind of assessment that you won’t get from most other sources, since Sedevacantism is the ugly duckling, the enfant terrible for those in the Vatican II Sect who consider themselves traditional Catholics. So far, only Fr. Anthony Cekada has weighed in briefly on the matter.

Before we begin, a clarifying reminder may be in order: We sedevacantists do not believe that Francis has lost the Papacy, either due to heresy or for any other reason. Rather, we believe that he never attained the Papacy in the first place, for the simple reason that, as a public heretic even before the 2013 conclave, he was simply not eligible for the Papacy or for any other office in the Catholic Church. That’s it in a nutshell.

Add To Cart

More than a week has now passed since the publication of the “Open Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church” released on Apr. 30 by nineteen Novus Ordo clergymen and academics accusing “Pope” Francis of being a pertinacious heretic and asking the addressees to declare him such and thereby remove him from office. Since then, many more academics and clerics have added their names to the Open Letter, and at the time of this writing, the total is up to 81 (see updates here).

While countless Novus Ordo web sites have covered the fallout from this so far and will continue to do so in the days to come, it is time for some sedevacantist analysis and commentary — the kind of assessment that you won’t get from most other sources, since Sedevacantism is the ugly duckling, the enfant terrible for those in the Vatican II Sect who consider themselves traditional Catholics. So far, only Fr. Anthony Cekada has weighed in briefly on the matter.

Before we begin, a clarifying reminder may be in order: We sedevacantists do not believe that Francis has lost the Papacy, either due to heresy or for any other reason. Rather, we believe that he never attained the Papacy in the first place, for the simple reason that, as a public heretic even before the 2013 conclave, he was simply not eligible for the Papacy or for any other office in the Catholic Church. That’s it in a nutshell.

More than a week has now passed since the publication of the “Open Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church” released on Apr. 30 by nineteen Novus Ordo clergymen and academics accusing “Pope” Francis of being a pertinacious heretic and asking the addressees to declare him such and thereby remove him from office. Since then, many more academics and clerics have added their names to the Open Letter, and at the time of this writing, the total is up to 81 (see updates here).

While countless Novus Ordo web sites have covered the fallout from this so far and will continue to do so in the days to come, it is time for some sedevacantist analysis and commentary — the kind of assessment that you won’t get from most other sources, since Sedevacantism is the ugly duckling, the enfant terrible for those in the Vatican II Sect who consider themselves traditional Catholics. So far, only Fr. Anthony Cekada has weighed in briefly on the matter.

Before we begin, a clarifying reminder may be in order: We sedevacantists do not believe that Francis has lost the Papacy, either due to heresy or for any other reason. Rather, we believe that he never attained the Papacy in the first place, for the simple reason that, as a public heretic even before the 2013 conclave, he was simply not eligible for the Papacy or for any other office in the Catholic Church. That’s it in a nutshell.

Stay in the loop

Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.

Thank you!

Come join the conversation on the True Catholic Faith Telegram Channel.

Copyright © 2025 True Catholic Faith