A Response to: “Vatican II - Of God or Satan? Vatican II: An Easy Way to Understand It - Explaining the Faith” By Father Chris Alar
In his talk Father Chris Alar attempts to separate Vatican II from the post-conciliar crisis, claiming that the Council itself was not heretical but merely misinterpreted.
However, this claim is false for three reasons:
Vatican II introduced doctrines condemned by infallible teachings (e.g., religious liberty, ecumenism).
Vatican II’s vague language was deliberately written to allow heresy.
The Novus Ordo Church is the direct result of Vatican II’s errors, not merely a “misinterpretation.”
Thus, Vatican II was not a renewal but the creation of a new, false religion designed to destroy Catholic Tradition.
Vatican II’s Doctrinal Errors Contradict Catholic Teaching
Vatican II contradicts prior infallible teachings in four major areas:
False Ecclesiology – Redefining the Church
False Religious Liberty – The Error of Indifferentism
False Ecumenism – A New Relationship with Heretics
The New Mass – A Protestantized Liturgy
In his talk Father Chris Alar attempts to separate Vatican II from the post-conciliar crisis, claiming that the Council itself was not heretical but merely misinterpreted.
However, this claim is false for three reasons:
Vatican II introduced doctrines condemned by infallible teachings (e.g., religious liberty, ecumenism).
Vatican II’s vague language was deliberately written to allow heresy.
The Novus Ordo Church is the direct result of Vatican II’s errors, not merely a “misinterpretation.”
Thus, Vatican II was not a renewal but the creation of a new, false religion designed to destroy Catholic Tradition.
Vatican II’s Doctrinal Errors Contradict Catholic Teaching
Vatican II contradicts prior infallible teachings in four major areas:
False Ecclesiology – Redefining the Church
False Religious Liberty – The Error of Indifferentism
False Ecumenism – A New Relationship with Heretics
The New Mass – A Protestantized Liturgy
In his talk Father Chris Alar attempts to separate Vatican II from the post-conciliar crisis, claiming that the Council itself was not heretical but merely misinterpreted.
However, this claim is false for three reasons:
Vatican II introduced doctrines condemned by infallible teachings (e.g., religious liberty, ecumenism).
Vatican II’s vague language was deliberately written to allow heresy.
The Novus Ordo Church is the direct result of Vatican II’s errors, not merely a “misinterpretation.”
Thus, Vatican II was not a renewal but the creation of a new, false religion designed to destroy Catholic Tradition.
Vatican II’s Doctrinal Errors Contradict Catholic Teaching
Vatican II contradicts prior infallible teachings in four major areas:
False Ecclesiology – Redefining the Church
False Religious Liberty – The Error of Indifferentism
False Ecumenism – A New Relationship with Heretics
The New Mass – A Protestantized Liturgy