
In a world of confusion, cynicism, and rejection of the supernatural, where can I find the
TRUE HISTORICAL CATHOLIC FAITH?
What happened to the Church?
Since the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965), the Catholic Church has seen significant change. Many faithful have noticed shifts in traditions, reverence, and teachings that once defined the faith across the globe. For those who grew up with the rich heritage of the Church, today’s practices may feel unfamiliar.

Reflecting on the Shift
What brought about these changes?
Vatican II introduced reforms aimed at modernizing the Church. Yet, for some, these adjustments raise questions about the continuity of Catholic teachings. Did these changes enhance the faith or move it away from its timeless roots?

Holding to the Unchanging Faith
For centuries, the Church preserved traditions and teachings that united Catholics worldwide. While much has evolved, the treasures of the faith remain accessible for those seeking deeper connection to its rich heritage — a heritage celebrated by saints and grounded in truth.

Rediscover and Reflect
We invite you to explore an essential question:
Can truth evolve with the times?
Join us in rediscovering the profound, unchanging beauty of the Catholic faith as practiced for generations. Whether you’re reconnecting with tradition or simply seeking clarity, this journey offers timeless inspiration.
Latest Videos:
Summary & Analysis of Gerry Matatics' Seminar: "Counterfeit Catholicism"
Central Thesis
Gerry Matatics argues that while the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ continues to exist, it has been eclipsed in visibility by a counterfeit church that emerged with Vatican II. This counterfeit church preaches a different gospel, promotes false doctrine, corrupts the liturgy, and undermines the immutable truths of the Catholic faith. Catholics are obliged, under pain of eternal loss, to separate themselves from this false religion and remain faithful to the true Church of all time.
Structure and Key Themes
1. The Catholic Church: The One True Church
Defined by her marks: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic (cf. Nicene Creed).
There is no salvation outside the Church (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus)—a dogma defined by the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), Council of Florence (Cantate Domino, 1442), and reaffirmed by Pope Pius IX (Singulari Quidem, 1856).
Salvation requires explicit faith in Christ and membership in the Mystical Body, which is the Catholic Church (cf. Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi, 1943).
"That true Catholic faith and that true Catholic Church is no longer found in its authenticity... even in Rome itself."
2. The Rise of a Counterfeit Church
Vatican II marked a rupture in continuity—not a legitimate development (cf. Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 1907).
The post-conciliar Church offers:
A new mass (Paul VI, Missale Romanum, 1969),
New sacraments (e.g., new rites of ordination, cf. Pontificale Romanum, 1968),
New doctrines (e.g., Dignitatis Humanae on religious liberty; Unitatis Redintegratio on ecumenism),
New laws (1983 Code of Canon Law),
New moral theology (cf. Amoris Laetitia, 2016).
"These [conciliar teachings] are not spotless. If they are not immaculately Catholic, they cannot come from Holy Mother Church."
3. Threefold Mission of the Church
Christ as Prophet, Priest, and King continues His mission through the Church (cf. Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi, §66).
The Church must always teach, sanctify, and govern in continuity with the deposit of faith (cf. Vatican I, Pastor Aeternus, 1870).
"The Church must always reflect without distortion the true faith that Christ and the Apostles taught."
4. The Great Apostasy Foretold
Scripture predicts a great falling away before Christ's return (cf. 2 Thess 2:3-11; Luke 18:8; Matt 24).
The apostasy will be internal and deceptive, with the appearance of Catholicism masking its falsehood (cf. Catechism of the Council of Trent, article on the Four Marks of the Church).
"A counterfeit Church will be erected with a counterfeit hierarchy, mass, sacraments, doctrines, and laws."
5. The Eclipse of the Church
Our Lady of La Salette (approved apparition, 1846): "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist... the Church will be in eclipse."
The true Church remains, though obscured by the false hierarchy and modernist religion (cf. Apocalypse 12:6, 13-17).
"That's not the Church—that's a Death Star dealing rays of spiritual death."
6. The Role of Enemies: Freemasonry, Communism, Modernism
God permits persecution to purify His Church (cf. Job 1–2).
Pope Leo XIII's vision (1884) led to the original long-form St. Michael Prayer and warned of Satan's century of influence.
Freemasonry and Modernism were condemned by Pope Leo XIII (Humanum Genus, 1884), Pope Pius IX (Syllabus of Errors, 1864), and Pope St. Pius X (Pascendi, 1907).
"Give me enough time and enough power over your Church, and I will destroy it."
7. Warnings from Saints and Popes
St. Nicholas of Flue: "The Church will be punished because the majority of her members... will become so perverted... it will seem to be extinguished."
Pope St. Pius X: "The apostasy of the Church is beginning."
Pope Leo XIII (vision) and Blessed Anna-Maria Taigi also warned of the Church appearing eclipsed or leaderless.
"According to many prophecies... the Church will be without a pope for some time."
Analysis from a Pre-Vatican II Sedevacantist Catholic Perspective
✅ Doctrinal Continuity
Dogma cannot change: "Tradition is the life of the Holy Spirit in the Church" (cf. St. Vincent of Lérins, Commonitorium, c. 434 A.D.).
Vatican I defined that the Pope has no power to invent new doctrine (Pastor Aeternus, 1870).
❌ Vatican II's Contradictions
Vatican II contradicts previous Magisterium:
Religious liberty vs. Quanta Cura (1864) and Syllabus of Errors (Propositions 15–18).
Ecumenism vs. Mortalium Animos (Pius XI, 1928).
Collegiality vs. papal primacy as defined at Vatican I.
The Modern Hierarchy
Manifest heretics are not members of the Church (cf. Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum, 1896; St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book II, Ch. 30).
A heretic cannot hold ecclesiastical office (cf. Canon 188 §4, 1917 Code of Canon Law).
"A manifest heretic is not a member of the Church, and thus cannot be her head." — St. Robert Bellarmine
The True Church Remains
As with the Arian crisis (4th century), the visible structures were usurped, but the faithful remnant preserved the true faith (cf. St. Athanasius).
The Church is visible but obscured (cf. Apocalypse 12:6); a "little flock" (Luke 12:32).
Final Call to Action
Faithful Catholics must:
Reject Vatican II and its new religion.
Refuse communion with heretical bishops and invalid sacraments (cf. Canon 1325 §2, 1917 Code).
Hold fast to the unchanging faith of the saints and martyrs (cf. Hebrews 13:8; Jude 1:3).
Persevere through the eclipse until God restores His Church in glory.
"Though He slay me, yet will I trust Him." — Job 13:15
Footnotes/Citations:
Mystici Corporis Christi, Pope Pius XII, 1943.
Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Pope St. Pius X, 1907.
Syllabus of Errors, Pope Pius IX, 1864.
Humanum Genus, Pope Leo XIII, 1884.
Pastor Aeternus, Vatican I, 1870.
Mortalium Animos, Pope Pius XI, 1928.
Canon Law (1917), Canon 188 §4.
Commonitorium, St. Vincent of Lérins.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice.
Our Lady of La Salette, approved Marian apparition, 1846.
Summary:
This is a candid testimony and theological critique by Father Gregory Hesse - a traditionally-formed priest who studied in Rome and was ordained in St. Peter’s Basilica in 1981. Initially accepting the post-Vatican II reforms, he later came to reject them after deeper study of Church tradition and theology. He holds advanced degrees in theology and canon law but acknowledges the formation he received was heavily influenced by modernist theologians like Rahner, Schillebeeckx, and de Lubac.
Father Gregory Hesse systematically exposes the doctrinal rupture between the Church of Vatican II and the pre-conciliar Church, focusing on:
The immutability of dogma and tradition
The invalidity and heretical nature of the Novus Ordo Mass
The non-binding nature of Vatican II
The errors of ecumenism and religious liberty
The role of the Holy Spirit and papal authority
The importance of the Traditional Latin Mass as the lex orandi, lex credendi
Key Quotes:
On Tradition and Doctrine:
“The truth cannot change. If anybody tells you the truth changes according to the times, he has ceased to be Catholic.”
“Tradition is complete. It was completed with the death of the last Apostle.”
“New aspects of doctrine? That’s heresy. The Holy Spirit was not promised to reveal anything new.”
On Vatican II:
“Vatican II goes directly against defined teachings… It’s null and void.”
“The present Pope says those who cannot accept Vatican II struggle with new doctrines. But new doctrines are not Catholic.”
On the Novus Ordo Mass:
“The Novus Ordo Missae is the smoke of Satan. It is something intrinsically evil.”
“The new Mass is the foundation of a new faith.”
“If the law of what must be prayed is changed, then the faith is changed.”
On the Pope and Infallibility:
“If a pope was to pronounce formal heresy, he would cease to be pope.”
“The pope cannot bind his successors in matters of discipline — but he is bound in matters of doctrine and faith.”
On Ecumenism and Religious Liberty:
“The Russian Orthodox are not our sister Church. They are heretics and schismatics.”
“Vatican II says man has the right to choose his religion — this was condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors.”
Major Takeaways:
Dogma and Tradition Cannot Change:
Any claim that doctrine evolves is fundamentally non-Catholic.
Vatican I (Pastor Aeternus) affirms that the Holy Spirit assists the pope not to reveal new doctrine but to guard and explain the deposit of faith.
Vatican II is Theologically Defective:
It explicitly contradicts previous magisterial teachings (e.g., on ecumenism and religious liberty).
The council claimed no dogmatic authority and thus its documents are non-binding.
The New Mass is a Break from Catholic Tradition:
The Novus Ordo undermines Catholic belief in the sacrificial nature of the Mass.
Quo Primum (1570) by St. Pius V binds all future popes to the Traditional Latin Mass.
Papal Heresy and Sedevacantism:
If a pope formally teaches heresy, he ceases to be pope.
Many post-Vatican II popes have taught errors materially or formally.
Faithful Catholics Must Cling to Pre-Vatican II Teaching:
Catholic truth is timeless and unchanging.
The faithful must reject the errors of the post-conciliar Church, even if the majority of clergy and laity have embraced them.
Pre-Vatican II Sedevacantist Analysis:
1. Authentic Catholic Doctrine Reaffirmed:
The speaker rightly upholds the unchangeability of truth.
Vatican I and the Council of Trent are cited to prove that popes cannot innovate in doctrine.
2. Vatican II Condemned as Heretical:
Vatican II’s teachings on religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae) and ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio) were already condemned.
Its non-dogmatic status proves it is not protected by infallibility.
3. Legitimacy of the Novus Ordo Rejected:
The Novus Ordo is not simply deficient — it is intrinsically evil, offensive to God, and harmful to souls.
Its very form undermines belief in the Real Presence and the sacrificial nature of the Mass.
4. Quo Primum is Still in Force:
St. Pius V’s bull made the Traditional Latin Mass permanent and unchangeable.
No pope has the authority to suppress it or replace it with a Protestantized liturgy.
5. Sedevacantism is the Logical Conclusion:
If post-conciliar “popes” have deviated from the faith, they cannot hold the papal office.
As St. Robert Bellarmine taught: a heretical pope loses office automatically.
Final Thoughts:
This testimony is a clear and powerful defense of traditional Catholic truth against the errors of the post-Vatican II pseudo-church. It is a wake-up call for Catholics who are still caught in the illusion that the modernist Church is the same Church of Christ.
As sedevacantists rightly observe: A Church that contradicts itself cannot be the true Church. The true Church of Christ is indefectible — it cannot lead souls into error. Therefore, the Church of Vatican II, with its new Mass, new doctrines, and new spirit, is not the Catholic Church founded by Our Lord.
Latest Articles:
Introduction
This lengthy study (originally published in Sodalitium) reviews Bp. Mark Pivarunas CMRI’s 2002 Pro grege letter, specifically his answer to Fr. Peter Scott (SSPX) who claims that forty-plus years without a pope would “destroy the visibility of the Church and the possibility of a future canonical election.” To defend sedevacantism, Pivarunas cites Cajetan—via Msgr. Charles Journet—arguing that, if the cardinals defect, papal election devolves upon the “universal Church.” The anonymous author accepts Pivarunas’ proof that the Holy See is vacant but shows that “universal Church” in Cajetan means an imperfect general council of bishops holding ordinary jurisdiction. Because strict (total) sedevacantism concedes no such bishops today, only the Cassiciacum (material-formal) thesis can preserve apostolic succession and a future election.
Key Quotes
“The universal Church and the Council are one and the same… distinguished only as represented and representative.”
“It is impossible for the Church to be left without a Pope and without the power to elect a Pope.”
“Titular bishops or those consecrated without papal mandate, lacking jurisdiction, are excluded from any papal election—even in extraordinary circumstances.”
“Traditionalists who hand the papacy over to laymen or priests unwittingly adopt the modernist error of a democratic Church.”
“According to the Thesis, the cardinals and residential bishops created by a merely material pope retain the potentia to elect, should they return to the public profession of the Faith.”
Key Messages
Two SSPX Objections Restated
Fr. Scott repeats Abp. Lefebvre’s twin charges: a decades-long interregnum contradicts indefectibility, and the absence of lawful electors makes any future conclave impossible.Historical Interregna Do Not Refute Sedevacantism
Pivarunas answers the first point with Fr. E. J. O’Reilly’s judgment on the Western Schism: even if opinions differ about legitimacy, a prolonged vacancy per se would not undermine Christ’s promises.Who Is the “Universal Church”?
Cajetan equates the “universal Church” with an imperfect general council composed of bishops and prelates with jurisdiction. Canon 223 (1917 Code) confirms this juridical criterion: cardinals, patriarchs, residential bishops, and Abbots-nullius have a deliberative vote because they govern portions of the flock.Strict Sedevacantism Lacks Electors
If all current residential bishops were appointed by anti-popes, embrace Vatican II errors, or remain in communion with John Paul II, they either lack valid office or have forfeited it through heresy. Bishops consecrated without papal mandate possess no jurisdiction; titular bishops may even be excluded from a council. Consequently, strict sedevacantism cannot identify a single lawful elector, much less convene a conclave.Cassiciacum Thesis Preserves Potency of Election
Fr. Guérard des Lauriers’ material-formal solution maintains that conciliar occupants and the hierarchy they constitute remain materially in office. Thus cardinals and residential bishops still exist in potentia as electors; once they abjure error, or the claimant abjures and thereby receives the form, apostolic succession revives without rupture.Duty of the Faithful
Catholics must safeguard the Faith, refuse the counterfeit conciliar authority, pray for the hierarchy’s conversion, and avoid lay-run “conclavist” elections that violate divine and ecclesiastical law.
Conclusion
From a sedevacantist standpoint, the article concedes Msgr. Pivarunas’ demonstration of a vacant Holy See yet exposes the Achilles’ heel of total sedevacantism: it cannot show where the divinely guaranteed power of election resides. By revisiting Cajetan, Journet, canon law, and magisterial decrees, the author proves that only prelates possessing jurisdiction may elect, and that this juridical substrate survives today solely on a material level. Hence the Cassiciacum Thesis uniquely upholds indefectibility, apostolic succession, and future restoration, while keeping Catholics from the twin errors of conciliar submission and reckless “do-it-yourself” conclaves.
Introduction
Rev. John Okerulu’s “A Defense of the Theological Sedevacantist Position” tackles the Gordian knot of post-conciliar authority. He argues that the body which convened Vatican II is not the Catholic Church at all but a parallel, non-Catholic sect; therefore its “popes” and hierarchy lack formal or even material authority. Against the Cassiciacum Thesis—which preserves material succession in the conciliar claimants—Okerulu vindicates “total” or theological sedevacantism, insisting that public heresy voids both papal elections and the current College of Cardinals. The essay’s aim is two-fold: to prove the vacancy of every Catholic see de jure and to show where the right of election now resides—a question vital for restoring Catholic order.
Key Quotes
“We will prove that the institution that convoked the Second Vatican Council is…a non-Catholic sect, and that therefore the ministers of this sect cannot be valid electors of the Roman Pontiff.”
“Both positions agree that the papal claimants since the Second Vatican Council…are false popes.”
“According to the consensus of canonists, a public heretic cannot validly be elected…cardinals of the Novus Ordo Sect…are public heretics and cannot elect one, or be elected, to the office of the Roman Pontiff.”
“For a valid exercise of the right of electing…the traditional Catholic bishops, a morally unanimous recognition…by the faithful is required, for ‘a doubtful pope is no pope.’”
“Let us…reject the Novus Ordo Sect whole and entire and confidently continue the mission of the Church under the indefectible guidance of the Holy Ghost.”
Key Messages
First Conclusion – Vatican II Sect
Okerulu demonstrates that the Vatican II institution publicly teaches condemned errors on religious liberty, ecumenism and collegiality; by classical definitions it is a non-Catholic sect and thus outside the Church’s juridical framework.Second Conclusion – Invalid Electors
Because its hierarchy adheres to heresy, every offices-holder forfeits membership and jurisdiction. The historic College of Cardinals effectively ceased when it embraced the new religion, so no one within the Novus Ordo structure can validly elect—or become—pope.Cassiciacum vs. Totalism
The Cassiciacum Thesis retains material succession in the conciliar claimants to preserve apostolicity; Theological Sedevacantism replies that heresy blocks even material designation, making their elections null and their nominations void. Therefore apostolicity survives only in traditional clergy, not in Vatican II’s paperwork.Third Conclusion – Who May Elect?
By devolution of right and the Church’s natural self-preservation, the faculty to elect the Roman Pontiff now lies with the surviving traditional Catholic bishops. Yet this power may be exercised only when a morally unanimous body of faithful recognizes both their right and the man elected, lest a “papa dubius” arise.Pastoral Imperative
The essay exhorts all traditional Catholics—FSSP, SSPX, Cassiciacum adherents alike—to abandon half-measures, sever remaining ties to the Novus Ordo establishment, and unite around the uncompromised mission of the Church under faithful bishops.
Conclusion
Okerulu’s defense of theological sedevacantism is uncompromising: Vatican II birthed a counterfeit church; its hierarchy cannot rule, teach, or elect; and the path to restoration runs through traditional bishops acknowledged by a united remnant. By eliminating the “material-formal” escape hatch, he seeks to protect indefectibility while refusing any collaboration with error. The article ends with a clarion call to re-ignite Catholic zeal, organize around true shepherds, and pray for the day when the Church, purged of modernist usurpers, once again possesses a visible, unquestionably Catholic Supreme Pontiff.
Introduction
Fr. Bernard Lucien’s essay The Problem of Authority in the Post-Conciliar Church: The Cassiciacum Thesis systematizes Bp. M.-L. Guérard des Lauriers’s explanation of today’s unprecedented ecclesial crisis. Written for traditional Catholics, it confronts the “question of authority”: how can men who promulgate Vatican II’s novelties still claim to govern the Church? The thesis answers by distinguishing between the formal (divinely assisted) and material (legal-occupancy) aspects of the papacy, thereby preserving historic visibility while accounting for manifest doctrinal rupture.
Key Quotes
“The ‘Thesis of Cassiciacum’ … explain[s] the current status of authority in the Church which is a Church in crisis.”
“Since 7 December 1965 the person occupying the Apostolic See is no longer formally the pope … he however remains materially a pope insofar as he has not been juridically deposed.”
“There is a direct and irreconcilable contradiction between the teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty and the previous infallible teaching of the Church… therefore, Paul VI could not have been formally the Pope.”
“The conclusion is clear: the absence of [papal] authority is firmly established.”
The occupant “should be compelled … to condemn the errors; only after such a demand is refused can deposition occur; should he comply, his act would ipso facto make him formally the Pope.”
Key Messages
Demonstrated Loss of Formal Authority
Using a reductio ad absurdum, the thesis proves that a pope cannot simultaneously teach error and possess the charism of infallibility. Vatican II’s doctrine of religious liberty contradicts Quanta cura and centuries of magisterium; hence the conciliar popes lack the form of papal authority even while occupying the see.Material Continuity of the Hierarchy
Although divine assistance is absent, the conciliar claimant lawfully holds the office’s matter (canonical election, public designation). This “material-formal” split avoids the extremes of (a) blind obedience to error or (b) a permanently vacant see that would sever apostolic succession. The Church remains socially visible yet “in a state of privation,” awaiting restoration of form.Hypothetical, Not Absolute, Deposition
The thesis is neither pure sedevacantism nor recognitionism: it posits that juridical deposition requires an authoritative warning and obstinate refusal. Thus, conversion remains possible; charity demands prayer and doctrinal witness rather than self-constituted tribunals.Protection of Infallibility and Credibility
By denying formal authority to innovators, the thesis safeguards Vatican I’s definition of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium. It explains how the faithful can reject conciliar errors without denying Christ’s promises or the Church’s indefectibility.Pastoral Implications for Traditional Catholics
Faithful must cling to the perennial magisterium, avoid communion with error, and receive sacraments from unquestionably Catholic clergy. Yet they must also recognize the material hierarchy so that, once the claimant repudiates error or a true pope is elected, the Church’s normal structures instantly revive.
Conclusion
From a sedevacantist perspective, Lucien’s synthesis offers a rigorously Thomistic path between capitulation and chaos. By rooting its demonstration in undeniable facts—chiefly Vatican II’s doctrinal contradictions—it concludes that the conciliar popes are material but not formal occupants of Peter’s chair. This preserves succession, explains the collapse of authority, and sustains hope: when Rome repudiates error, divine assistance will again animate the papacy and heal the Church. Until that day, Catholics must “hold fast the traditions” (2 Thes 2:15) and labor for the Triumph of the Faith.
Learn Traditional Latin Prayers:
Praying in Latin preserves the Church's unchanging doctrine, strengthens spiritual life, and fosters unity among Catholics. It connects the faithful to centuries of tradition, safeguarding against modernist influences and doctrinal errors. Embracing Latin is essential for those committed to maintaining the true Catholic Faith and participating fully in the Traditional Latin Mass.
Intro 3 from True Catholic Faith's Latin course focuses on Ecclesiastical Latin pronunciation, guiding learners to speak and pray confidently in the Traditional Latin Mass. It emphasizes the Italian-style pronunciation adopted by the Church, differing from Classical Latin. The lesson introduces key learning techniques and resources to enhance one's prayer life in Latin.
The Sign of the Cross (Signum Crucis) is the foundational gesture of the Catholic Faith. It proclaims belief in the Holy Trinity and the redeeming Cross of Christ. In the face of Vatican II’s modernist errors and the pseudo-church it created, this sacred sign becomes an open profession of fidelity to the true Church of all time, and a rejection of all heresies.
Summary of the Video
This documentary investigates the Cardinal Siri Thesis, which claims that Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was the validly elected pope in the 1958 papal conclave, taking the name Gregory XVII, but was forced to abdicate under threat—thus beginning a period of usurpation of the Papacy by modernist and Masonic forces.
Key Takeaways
1. Historical Precedent of Papal Usurpation
Antipope Anacletus II (1130) usurped the papacy from Pope Innocent II.
St. Bernard supported Innocent II based on his holiness, legitimacy of election, and valid consecration.
2. The 1903 Conclave and Occult Influence
Cardinal Rampolla was nearly elected but was vetoed due to his links to occultism and Freemasonry.
He was part of the OTO (Ordo Templi Orientis), a group linked to Crowley and Steiner.
3. The 1958 Conclave
On October 26, 1958, white smoke rose from the Sistine Chapel for 5 minutes, indicating a pope had been elected.
No pope appeared; two days later, Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) was presented instead.
Multiple sources (including FBI declassified files, Fr. Malachi Martin, and Cardinal Siri's own words) claim Cardinal Siri was elected but forced to step down under threat.
4. Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) and Vatican II
Had ties to Freemasons, Communists, and Modernists.
Called Vatican II, which revolutionized doctrine and liturgy.
Quote from a Freemason: “We support the revolution of John XXIII.”
5. Giovanni Battista Montini (Paul VI)
Promoted by John XXIII despite being suspected of homosexual activity, modernism, and leaking Vatican secrets to Soviets.
Instituted the Novus Ordo Missae (New Mass) in 1969, based on Protestant models, removing sacrificial language and changing the words of consecration.
Annibale Bugnini, architect of the New Mass, was a Freemason.
6. Massive Collapse Post-Vatican II
Drop in vocations: priests, nuns, seminarians.
Collapse of faith: majority of Catholics no longer believe in the Real Presence.
Acceptance of contraception, abortion, and indifferentism.
Key Quotes
From a traditional sedevacantist perspective, the film strongly reinforces the foundational beliefs:
Papal Usurpation Is Real
The idea that illegitimate “popes” can occupy the throne aligns with Catholic history, e.g., antipopes like Anacletus II and Felix V.
John XXIII and his successors fit the profile of manifest heretics and usurpers, as defined by Canon Law and papal teachings (cf. Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Paul IV, 1559).
John XXIII and Paul VI Are Heretics
Their public deviation from Catholic dogma (religious liberty, ecumenism, indifferentism, modernist liturgy) means they could not have validly held papal office.
This aligns with St. Robert Bellarmine: A heretic is ipso facto deposed from ecclesiastical office.
Change of the Mass = Null Sacraments
The New Mass invalidates the sacrament by changing the form of consecration, specifically "for many" to "for all".
According to Pope St. Pius V’s Quo Primum and De Defectibus, this change is not only illicit but invalid.
Evidence of Siri's Election
If true, Siri’s coerced abdication would be canonically null, as coercion invalidates resignation (1917 Code of Canon Law, canon 185, 219).
Points to Emphasize from the True Catholic Position
Roncalli's Masonic Connections
Being a Freemason is an excommunicable offense, rendering Roncalli outside the Church and hence incapable of valid papal office.
Vatican II Is Not a Valid Council
Since it was convoked and led by non-Catholic usurpers, its documents are null, void, and non-binding, per traditional ecclesiology.
False “Popes” Have No Authority
The so-called popes after 1958 (John XXIII onward) are antipopes, not just in moral failure but in juridical reality.
Catholics owe no obedience to them.
The True Church Endures
Though eclipsed, the true Church continues in the remnant faithful to the traditional Latin Mass, valid sacraments, and the unchanging Magisterium.
Critical Caution
While the evidence presented is compelling and substantial, especially when matched with the apostasy seen post-1958, sedevacantists must avoid dogmatizing the Siri Thesis. The core of the sedevacantist position is that manifest heresy excludes from office, regardless of who was validly elected in 1958. Siri’s potential papacy is a possible historical explanation, but not a doctrinal necessity.
Conclusion
This documentary provides a coherent narrative aligning closely with sedevacantist analysis: the Papacy was hijacked, false popes introduced heresy and invalid sacraments, and the visible structures of the Church were overtaken by enemies prophesied in Scripture and by saints.
The faithful must return to:
The Mass of All Time (pre-1962 Tridentine Rite)
The Catechism of St. Pius X
Sacraments from validly ordained traditional priests
Absolute rejection of Vatican II and the modernist sect