8.212. Why do some traditional Catholics not attend Novus Ordo funerals, weddings, or confirmations?
Traditional Catholics who adhere to the faith as it was universally practiced before Vatican II often choose not to attend Novus Ordo ceremonies — including funerals, weddings, and confirmations — because these rites are associated with the new religion that emerged from the Council and diverged from the Roman Catholic Faith. To understand this, one must grasp both the nature of the traditional sacraments and the rupture introduced by the post-conciliar reforms.
1. The Problem with the Novus Ordo Rites
The post-Vatican II changes to the liturgy and sacraments were not mere modifications for pastoral reasons; they were sweeping overhauls that altered the theology, symbolism, and substance of the rites. The new rites of ordination, confirmation, marriage, and the funeral liturgy reflect a fundamentally different theology than what the Catholic Church taught and practiced for centuries.
In many cases, these sacraments are invalid due to defective matter, form, or intention — the three requirements for sacramental validity as defined by the Council of Trent (Session VII, Canons on the Sacraments). For example:
Novus Ordo Confirmations: The revised rite of confirmation changed the essential formula. Pope Pius XII had defined the traditional form ("I sign thee with the sign of the Cross...") as essential. The new rite uses a completely different formula and is administered by bishops of doubtful orders.
Novus Ordo Marriages: These are frequently conducted without a proper understanding of the indissolubility of marriage, often by invalidly ordained priests, and sometimes between Catholics and non-Catholics without the proper canonical form or dispensations.
Novus Ordo Funerals: These are now often celebratory in tone, downplaying the need for prayers for the repose of the soul, and sometimes even canonizing the deceased. They omit the traditional focus on purgatory and the Four Last Things (death, judgment, heaven, and hell).
2. Avoiding Implicit Approval of a False Religion
Attending such events may give the impression of approval or endorsement of the post-Vatican II religion, which traditional Catholics recognize as a counterfeit “church” masquerading under Catholic labels. St. Paul commands:
“Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness?”
To attend a Novus Ordo ceremony — especially one administered by a heretical or invalid “priest” or “bishop” — is to risk cooperating in the spread of a false religion. This is not mere personal preference, but a matter of guarding the true Faith and avoiding scandal.
3. Exception: Family Obligations with Conditions
Some traditional Catholic priests may allow attendance at such events under specific conditions (e.g., remaining silent and not actively participating, such as not responding aloud, not receiving “communion,” and not attending the reception or party). These are exceptions for grave reasons, such as honoring filial duty at a parent’s funeral or showing support to a loved one — but always with clear personal boundaries to avoid giving scandal.
4. Saints, Popes, and Theologians on Avoiding False Worship
St. John Chrysostom said,
“It is not enough not to do evil; one must also not appear to do evil.”
Pope Leo XIII wrote that Catholics may not take part in non-Catholic worship, even if it seems reverent (Encyclical Satis Cognitum, 1896). Similarly, Pope Pius XI condemned the appearance of religious unity with false sects (Mortalium Animos, 1928).
Attending Novus Ordo “sacraments” conducted by doubtful “clergy” in a doubtful rite does just that. The issue is not about judging individuals but about protecting one’s soul, avoiding scandal, and remaining faithful to Christ and His Church — the true Church, not the counterfeit post-Vatican II structure.
Category | Traditional Catholic View | Novus Ordo View | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Nature of the Rites | Unchanged, rooted in Apostolic Tradition, clearly Catholic | Rewritten rites with Protestant and Modernist theology | New rites were intentionally ecumenical and ambiguous |
Validity | Valid sacraments with correct form, matter, and intention | Doubtful or invalid due to form, intention, or invalid ministers | Especially serious in Confirmation and Holy Orders |
Funeral Focus | Requiem Mass, prayer for the soul, reminder of judgment | Celebration of life, assumption of heaven, vague hope | Neglects purgatory and urgency of repentance |
Marriage Theology | Indissoluble, sacramental, hierarchical roles of spouses | Modernist, often unclear, open to contraception or cohabitation | Post-Vatican II annulments and mixed marriages are rampant |
Participation | Participation is through interior devotion and reverence | Focus on active involvement, applause, and gestures | Attending may imply approval or participation |
Spiritual Risk | Attending illicit or doubtful rites is forbidden | Viewed as a matter of personal conscience or family unity | Subjective feelings cannot override truth and doctrine |
Summary:
Traditional Catholics avoid Novus Ordo funerals, weddings, and confirmations because these rites are no longer Catholic in theology or practice. Following Vatican II, the rites were rewritten with ecumenical, modernist, and even Protestant influences. The Council of Trent and the popes for centuries defined the requirements for sacramental validity, and the new rites often fail to meet these conditions, especially due to doubtful form and ministers of questionable ordination.
Attending such ceremonies risks giving scandal or tacit approval to a counterfeit religion. The appearance of communion with heretics and participation in doubtful sacraments is contrary to Catholic teaching and discipline. Pope Pius XI made it clear in Mortalium Animos that Catholics must not even appear to join in common worship with those outside the Church.
While family or social obligations may present emotional pressure, the salvation of souls and the integrity of the Faith must come first. If attendance is permitted by a traditional priest, it must be passive — with no responses, no communion, and no involvement in celebratory events.
The issue is not harshness or lack of love — it is precisely because of charity and fidelity to Christ that traditional Catholics make difficult sacrifices to protect their souls, avoid scandal, and witness to the truth. These ceremonies are not benign; they are the fruits of a revolution that has led countless souls away from the true Church.
The danger is compounded by the fact that many of the Novus Ordo clergy are not validly ordained. The rites of Holy Orders were changed in 1968, and multiple theologians — including some who are not sedevacantist — have questioned their validity. This means the supposed sacraments offered by these men may be null and void, offering no grace at all.
Lastly, it is important to remember that the true Church, though eclipsed, still exists in faithful priests and bishops who preserve the traditional rites and sacraments. It is here that true spiritual nourishment can be found — not in the counterfeit religion born of Vatican II.