7.4. What is wrong with 'Recognize and Resist'? Isn’t it the prudent path during a crisis?

"Recognize and Resist" (R&R) is the belief that one must recognize the post-Vatican II claimants as true popes while resisting their errors, laws, and disciplines.

But the Church teaches:

  • A true pope must be obeyed in faith and discipline (Pastor Aeternus, Vatican I).

  • The Church is indefectible: she cannot give universal error in faith or morals.

If a "pope" imposes heresy or dangerous liturgical rites on the whole Church, then he cannot be the pope. The R&R position tries to preserve the idea of a pope while denying the consequences of his heresy. This is inconsistent, non-Catholic, and leads to chaos and selective obedience.

For example, many R&R adherents reject “Pope” Francis's teaching in Amoris Laetitia, which permits adulterers to receive Communion, or reject his canonization of John Paul II, yet still insist he is a true pope. This undermines the Catholic understanding of the papacy, which cannot be separated from doctrinal fidelity and universal jurisdiction. Such contradictions reveal that R&R is not a prudent path—it is a theological compromise that ultimately denies both papal infallibility and the Church's indefectibility.

Previous
Previous

7.3. What about the FSSP, ICKSP, and diocesan Traditional Latin Masses? Aren’t these fully approved and safe?

Next
Next

7.5. Why would God allow good people to attend these groups if they’re wrong?