8.51. Aren’t all religions just different paths to God, as long as we’re sincere and love others?

This is one of the most widespread errors in the modern world—and tragically, it’s now taught or implied by the Vatican II “church” itself. Nostra Aetate, Lumen Gentium (§16), and nearly every post-Vatican II “pope” have suggested that non-Catholic religions can be means of grace or salvation, and that all sincere believers are “on a path to God.” Francis has even said,

We are all children of God, whatever our religion.
— Antipope Francis

But this is the heresy of religious indifferentism—the idea that one religion is as good as another, or that salvation is possible in any religion. The Catholic Church has always condemned this lie. There is only one true religion, founded by Jesus Christ, outside of which no one can be saved. All false religions are deceptions, no matter how sincere their followers. To promote the idea that “all paths lead to God” is to deny Christ, mock His Cross, and encourage souls to remain in darkness.

Below is a doctrinal comparison between the Catholic Faith and the Vatican II error of religious indifferentism.

Category Traditional Catholic Doctrine Vatican II / Modern Indifferentism Remarks
Truth Only the Catholic Church teaches the fullness of revealed truth All religions contain “elements of truth” and lead to the divine Truth is one; partial truths mixed with error cannot sanctify or save
Path to God Christ is the only way to the Father (John 14:6) Every religion is a “path to God” if followed sincerely This contradicts divine revelation and leads souls to remain in falsehood
Salvation Outside the Church there is no salvation (*Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus*) People can be saved in any religion through sincerity and love This is heresy condemned by popes and councils from antiquity through Pius XII
False Religions Are man-made errors or diabolical deceptions Are worthy of respect and considered “means of grace” To call error good is to insult God, who is Truth itself
Evangelization All must be converted to the Catholic Faith to be saved Conversion is not necessary; dialogue and coexistence are preferred This denies the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19–20)
Interreligious Prayer Condemned as sacrilegious and scandalous Encouraged at Assisi, in synagogues, mosques, temples, and UN meetings To pray with heretics and pagans is to deny the One True God
Mission of the Church To convert the nations, baptize, and teach all to obey Christ To accompany and affirm all peoples in their chosen religions This humanistic approach replaces salvation with inclusivity
View of Jesus Christ The only Savior and King; all must believe in Him to be saved One of many “encounters” with the divine; not strictly necessary Denies Christ’s divinity, uniqueness, and salvific mission
Fruits Martyrs, conversions, saints, religious orders, clarity of doctrine Indifferentism, loss of faith, apostasies, syncretism The post-Vatican II “fruit” is visible apostasy in practice and belief

Summary:

The claim that “we’re all on different paths to God” is a lie from hell. There is only one path: Jesus Christ, through His one true Church, the Catholic Church. All other religions are false paths that cannot save—no matter how sincere their followers may be. This truth is not harsh, but merciful, because it calls souls out of error and into salvation.

Vatican II’s indifferentism contradicts:

  • Scripture: “He that believeth not shall be condemned” (Mark 16:16)

  • Tradition: “Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus”

  • Councils: Florence, Trent, Vatican I

  • Popes: Pius IX, Leo XIII, Pius XI, and Pius XII

As Pope Gregory XVI declared:

This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs.
— Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (1832)
Previous
Previous

8.50. Doesn’t Vatican II’s focus on the dignity of man, the Incarnation, and Christ’s universal love show how beautiful the Gospel really is?

Next
Next

8.52. Didn’t Vatican II just develop doctrine in the modern world, like the Church has always done?